Lovecraft invented the idea that there
were things that the human mind could not contain. That the mere
apprehension of them would render someone incapable of rational
thought thereafter. Whether physical things or creatures, or simply
bits of knowledge, even individual words, he brought forth the idea
that not only is man not paramount in the universe, not only is he
insignificant, he is incapable of functioning on any number of higher
levels that are commonplace.
And that is a pretty good description
of horror. To be confronted not with something that is not
understood, but which cannot be understood. The horror that
fascinates us, such as the serial killer, is not in that a human is
capable of such acts, but that there is no comprehensible reason for
it. In order to defuse that horror, police procedurals and manhunt
movies use psychology and simplifications of psychology to explain
that certain events cause people to respond in certain ways.
But the simple fact is, there are
things we don't understand and, in the end, can't understand.
Science has its limits, so far, and the human mind is most adept at
putting new things in terms of things already understood (hence the
word analogy). But even without horror, there are things that most
people simply can't encompass. There are mathematicians who claim to
be able to visualize 4 or more-dimensional space, which is something
I can't even figure out how to approach.
Scale is another one. There are 7
billion people in the world, roughly. In order to understand what
that number means, we have to resort to a series of reductions and
analogies that bring the numbers into something that a person can
easily comprehend. There are on the order of 100 billion stars in
the Milky Way, and about 100 billion galaxies in the universe. That
means, assuming that the Milky Way is roughly average, that there are
10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (that's 10 sextillion) stars in the
universe. That's about a thousand times as many grains of sand as
exist on all the beaches and deserts in the world (can't find a count
that includes river/lake/ocean floors).
That means that, in order for there to
be as many grains of sand on Earth beaches as there are stars in the
observable universe, we would have to replicate the Earth, perfectly,
1,000 times.
Think about that one for a minute. If
it doesn't tweak your gourd a little, you're not thinking hard
enough.
411
No comments:
Post a Comment